Botswana vs Malta: Proportion of forest area with long term management plan
Botswana
10.81
in 2020
Malta
11.43
in 2020
Botswana rank
99th
Malta rank
97th
Proportion of forest area with long term management plan over time
- Botswana
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 11.43 against 10.81 in Botswana, a difference of 0.62.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 99th and Malta ranks 97th of 119 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.81 | 10.71 | 0.095 | Botswana |
| 2020s | 10.81 | 11.43 | 0.62 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with long term management plan, Botswana or Malta?
- Malta, at 11.43 against 10.81 in Botswana as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with long term management plan between Botswana and Malta?
- 0.62, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Malta?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2020.
- How do Botswana and Malta rank globally for proportion of forest area with long term management plan?
- Botswana ranks 99th and Malta ranks 97th of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area with long term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.