Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Proportion of forest area with long term management plan
Botswana
10.81
in 2020
Zimbabwe
4.57
in 2020
Botswana rank
99th
Zimbabwe rank
102nd
Proportion of forest area with long term management plan over time
- Botswana
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 10.81 against 4.57 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 6.24.
That makes Botswana's figure about 2.4 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 99th and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 119 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.81 | 4.64 | 6.17 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 10.81 | 4.57 | 6.24 | Botswana |
| 2020s | 10.81 | 4.57 | 6.24 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with long term management plan, Botswana or Zimbabwe?
- Botswana, at 10.81 against 4.57 in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with long term management plan between Botswana and Zimbabwe?
- 6.24, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Zimbabwe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Botswana and Zimbabwe rank globally for proportion of forest area with long term management plan?
- Botswana ranks 99th and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area with long term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.