Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Proportion of forest area with long term management plan
Brazil
8.96
in 2020
Zimbabwe
4.57
in 2020
Brazil rank
100th
Zimbabwe rank
102nd
Proportion of forest area with long term management plan over time
- Brazil
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 8.96 against 4.57 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 4.39.
That makes Brazil's figure about 2.0 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Brazil ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 119 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.83 | 4.64 | 2.81 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 7.04 | 4.57 | 2.46 | Brazil |
| 2020s | 8.96 | 4.57 | 4.39 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with long term management plan, Brazil or Zimbabwe?
- Brazil, at 8.96 against 4.57 in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with long term management plan between Brazil and Zimbabwe?
- 4.39, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Zimbabwe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Zimbabwe rank globally for proportion of forest area with long term management plan?
- Brazil ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area with long term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.