Chile vs El Salvador: Proportion of forest area with long term management plan
Chile
0.09
in 2020
El Salvador
0.05
in 2020
Chile rank
112th
El Salvador rank
115th
Proportion of forest area with long term management plan over time
- Chile
- El Salvador
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.09 against 0.05 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.04.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.8 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was El Salvador ahead.
Chile ranks 112th and El Salvador ranks 115th of 119 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.008 | 0.042 | 0.034 | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.04 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with long term management plan, Chile or El Salvador?
- Chile, at 0.09 against 0.05 in El Salvador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with long term management plan between Chile and El Salvador?
- 0.04, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and El Salvador?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Chile and El Salvador rank globally for proportion of forest area with long term management plan?
- Chile ranks 112th and El Salvador ranks 115th of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area with long term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.