Chile vs Eswatini: Proportion of forest area with long term management plan
Chile
0.09
in 2020
Eswatini
0.07
in 2020
Chile rank
112th
Eswatini rank
114th
Proportion of forest area with long term management plan over time
- Chile
- Eswatini
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.09 against 0.07 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.02.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Eswatini ahead.
Chile ranks 112th and Eswatini ranks 114th of 119 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0067 | 0.045 | 0.0383 | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.02 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with long term management plan, Chile or Eswatini?
- Chile, at 0.09 against 0.07 in Eswatini as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with long term management plan between Chile and Eswatini?
- 0.02, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Eswatini?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Eswatini rank globally for proportion of forest area with long term management plan?
- Chile ranks 112th and Eswatini ranks 114th of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area with long term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.