Chile vs Wallis and Futuna: Share of forest with a long-term management plan
Chile
0.1%
in 2025
Wallis and Futuna
0.9%
in 2025
Chile rank
121st
Wallis and Futuna rank
118th
Share of forest with a long-term management plan over time
- Chile
- Wallis and Futuna
How they compare
Wallis and Futuna currently reports 0.9% against 0.1% in Chile, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Wallis and Futuna's figure about 7.6 times Chile's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Wallis and Futuna has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 121st and Wallis and Futuna ranks 118th of 131 countries.
Wallis and Futuna has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Wallis and Futuna | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 1.3% | 1.3% | Wallis and Futuna |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.9% | 0.8% | Wallis and Futuna |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of forest with a long-term management plan, Chile or Wallis and Futuna?
- Wallis and Futuna, at 0.9% against 0.1% in Chile as of 2025.
- What is the difference in share of forest with a long-term management plan between Chile and Wallis and Futuna?
- 0.8%, with Wallis and Futuna ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Wallis and Futuna?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Wallis and Futuna rank globally for share of forest with a long-term management plan?
- Chile ranks 121st and Wallis and Futuna ranks 118th of 131 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of forest with a long-term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%).