China vs Estonia: Proportion of forest area with long term management plan
China
73.22
in 2020
Estonia
69.81
in 2020
China rank
37th
Estonia rank
40th
Proportion of forest area with long term management plan over time
- China
- Estonia
How they compare
China currently reports 73.22 against 69.81 in Estonia, a difference of 3.41.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Estonia ahead.
China ranks 37th and Estonia ranks 40th of 119 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.29 | 50.81 | 4.52 | Estonia |
| 2010s | 66.45 | 68.16 | 1.71 | Estonia |
| 2020s | 73.22 | 69.81 | 3.41 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with long term management plan, China or Estonia?
- China, at 73.22 against 69.81 in Estonia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with long term management plan between China and Estonia?
- 3.41, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Estonia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do China and Estonia rank globally for proportion of forest area with long term management plan?
- China ranks 37th and Estonia ranks 40th of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area with long term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.