Croatia vs Finland: Proportion of forest area with long term management plan
Croatia
100
in 2020
Finland
100
in 2020
Croatia rank
1st
Finland rank
1st
Proportion of forest area with long term management plan over time
- Croatia
- Finland
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 100 against 100 in Finland, a difference of 0.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 1st and Finland ranks 1st of 119 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.64 | 100 | 28.36 | Finland |
| 2010s | 87.86 | 99.88 | 12.02 | Finland |
| 2020s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with long term management plan, Croatia or Finland?
- Croatia, at 100 against 100 in Finland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with long term management plan between Croatia and Finland?
- 0, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Finland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Croatia and Finland rank globally for proportion of forest area with long term management plan?
- Croatia ranks 1st and Finland ranks 1st of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area with long term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.