Ecuador vs Serbia: Proportion of forest area with long term management plan
Ecuador
44.76
in 2020
Serbia
42.16
in 2020
Ecuador rank
61st
Serbia rank
64th
Proportion of forest area with long term management plan over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 44.76 against 42.16 in Serbia, a difference of 2.6.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Serbia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 64th of 119 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.74 | 73.51 | 40.77 | Serbia |
| 2010s | 43.16 | 43.04 | 0.1133 | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 44.76 | 42.16 | 2.6 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with long term management plan, Ecuador or Serbia?
- Ecuador, at 44.76 against 42.16 in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with long term management plan between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 2.6, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for proportion of forest area with long term management plan?
- Ecuador ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 64th of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area with long term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.