Estonia vs New Zealand: Share of forest with a long-term management plan
Estonia
71.2%
in 2025
New Zealand
75.3%
in 2025
Estonia rank
41st
New Zealand rank
39th
Share of forest with a long-term management plan over time
- Estonia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 75.3% against 71.2% in Estonia, a difference of 4.1%.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 41st and New Zealand ranks 39th of 131 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 79.1% | 64.5% | 14.6% | Estonia |
| 2000s | 50.8% | 71.1% | 20.3% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 68.2% | 74.9% | 6.7% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 71.5% | 75.3% | 3.8% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of forest with a long-term management plan, Estonia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 75.3% against 71.2% in Estonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in share of forest with a long-term management plan between Estonia and New Zealand?
- 4.1%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and New Zealand?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Estonia and New Zealand rank globally for share of forest with a long-term management plan?
- Estonia ranks 41st and New Zealand ranks 39th of 131 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of forest with a long-term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%).