Finland vs Hungary: Share of forest with a long-term management plan
Finland
100.0%
in 2025
Hungary
100.0%
in 2025
Finland rank
1st
Hungary rank
1st
Share of forest with a long-term management plan over time
- Finland
- Hungary
How they compare
Finland currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Hungary, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 1st and Hungary ranks 1st of 131 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 97.6% | 88.0% | 9.6% | Finland |
| 2000s | 100.0% | 93.2% | 6.8% | Finland |
| 2010s | 99.9% | 99.7% | 0.1% | Finland |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 99.9% | 0.1% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of forest with a long-term management plan, Finland or Hungary?
- Finland, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Hungary as of 2025.
- What is the difference in share of forest with a long-term management plan between Finland and Hungary?
- 0.0%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Hungary?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Finland and Hungary rank globally for share of forest with a long-term management plan?
- Finland ranks 1st and Hungary ranks 1st of 131 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of forest with a long-term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%).