Guinea-Bissau vs Namibia: Proportion of forest area with long term management plan
Guinea-Bissau
1.29
in 2020
Namibia
3.03
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau rank
109th
Namibia rank
106th
Proportion of forest area with long term management plan over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 3.03 against 1.29 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 1.74.
That makes Namibia's figure about 2.3 times Guinea-Bissau's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 109th and Namibia ranks 106th of 119 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.34 | 0.78 | 0.56 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 1.32 | 2.91 | 1.6 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 1.29 | 3.03 | 1.74 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with long term management plan, Guinea-Bissau or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 3.03 against 1.29 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with long term management plan between Guinea-Bissau and Namibia?
- 1.74, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Namibia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Namibia rank globally for proportion of forest area with long term management plan?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 109th and Namibia ranks 106th of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area with long term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.