Hungary vs Malta: Share of forest with a long-term management plan
Hungary
100.0%
in 2025
Malta
100.0%
in 2025
Hungary rank
1st
Malta rank
1st
Share of forest with a long-term management plan over time
- Hungary
- Malta
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Malta, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malta ahead.
Hungary ranks 1st and Malta ranks 1st of 131 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 88.0% | 100.0% | 12.0% | Malta |
| 2000s | 93.2% | 100.0% | 6.8% | Malta |
| 2010s | 99.7% | 40.5% | 59.3% | Hungary |
| 2020s | 99.9% | 100.0% | 0.1% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of forest with a long-term management plan, Hungary or Malta?
- Hungary, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Malta as of 2025.
- What is the difference in share of forest with a long-term management plan between Hungary and Malta?
- 0.0%, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Malta?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Hungary and Malta rank globally for share of forest with a long-term management plan?
- Hungary ranks 1st and Malta ranks 1st of 131 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of forest with a long-term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%).