Iceland vs Nepal: Proportion of forest area with long term management plan
Iceland
85.88
in 2020
Nepal
82.72
in 2020
Iceland rank
26th
Nepal rank
28th
Proportion of forest area with long term management plan over time
- Iceland
- Nepal
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 85.88 against 82.72 in Nepal, a difference of 3.16.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nepal ahead.
Iceland ranks 26th and Nepal ranks 28th of 119 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.96 | 82.87 | 38.91 | Nepal |
| 2010s | 81.37 | 82.72 | 1.35 | Nepal |
| 2020s | 85.88 | 82.72 | 3.16 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with long term management plan, Iceland or Nepal?
- Iceland, at 85.88 against 82.72 in Nepal as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with long term management plan between Iceland and Nepal?
- 3.16, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Nepal?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Iceland and Nepal rank globally for proportion of forest area with long term management plan?
- Iceland ranks 26th and Nepal ranks 28th of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area with long term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.