Iceland vs Poland: Share of forest with a long-term management plan
Iceland
96.3%
in 2025
Poland
98.6%
in 2025
Iceland rank
20th
Poland rank
19th
Share of forest with a long-term management plan over time
- Iceland
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 98.6% against 96.3% in Iceland, a difference of 2.3%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 20th and Poland ranks 19th of 131 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.2% | 89.8% | 45.6% | Poland |
| 2010s | 80.7% | 94.6% | 13.9% | Poland |
| 2020s | 93.5% | 98.1% | 4.6% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of forest with a long-term management plan, Iceland or Poland?
- Poland, at 98.6% against 96.3% in Iceland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in share of forest with a long-term management plan between Iceland and Poland?
- 2.3%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Poland rank globally for share of forest with a long-term management plan?
- Iceland ranks 20th and Poland ranks 19th of 131 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of forest with a long-term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%).