Iceland vs Sweden: Proportion of forest area with long term management plan
Iceland
85.88
in 2020
Sweden
81.06
in 2020
Iceland rank
26th
Sweden rank
29th
Proportion of forest area with long term management plan over time
- Iceland
- Sweden
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 85.88 against 81.06 in Sweden, a difference of 4.82.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sweden ahead.
Iceland ranks 26th and Sweden ranks 29th of 119 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.96 | 95.68 | 51.72 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 81.37 | 81.08 | 0.2883 | Iceland |
| 2020s | 85.88 | 81.06 | 4.82 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with long term management plan, Iceland or Sweden?
- Iceland, at 85.88 against 81.06 in Sweden as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with long term management plan between Iceland and Sweden?
- 4.82, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sweden?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Iceland and Sweden rank globally for proportion of forest area with long term management plan?
- Iceland ranks 26th and Sweden ranks 29th of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area with long term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.