Isle of Man vs Latvia: Share of forest with a long-term management plan
Isle of Man
100.0%
in 2020
Latvia
95.3%
in 2025
Isle of Man rank
1st
Latvia rank
23rd
Share of forest with a long-term management plan over time
- Isle of Man
- Latvia
How they compare
Isle of Man currently reports 100.0% against 95.3% in Latvia, a difference of 4.7%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Isle of Man ahead.
Isle of Man ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 23rd of 131 countries.
Isle of Man has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Isle of Man | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 100.0% | 97.2% | 2.8% | Isle of Man |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 93.5% | 6.5% | Isle of Man |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of forest with a long-term management plan, Isle of Man or Latvia?
- Isle of Man, at 100.0% against 95.3% in Latvia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in share of forest with a long-term management plan between Isle of Man and Latvia?
- 4.7%, with Isle of Man ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Isle of Man and Latvia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Isle of Man and Latvia rank globally for share of forest with a long-term management plan?
- Isle of Man ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 23rd of 131 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of forest with a long-term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%).