Malaysia vs Nepal: Share of forest with a long-term management plan
Malaysia
57.4%
in 2025
Nepal
56.3%
in 2025
Malaysia rank
56th
Nepal rank
59th
Share of forest with a long-term management plan over time
- Malaysia
- Nepal
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 57.4% against 56.3% in Nepal, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 56th and Nepal ranks 59th of 131 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 47.0% | 19.0% | 27.9% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 45.7% | 48.5% | 2.8% | Nepal |
| 2010s | 53.6% | 74.3% | 20.7% | Nepal |
| 2020s | 56.6% | 56.6% | 0.0% | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of forest with a long-term management plan, Malaysia or Nepal?
- Malaysia, at 57.4% against 56.3% in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in share of forest with a long-term management plan between Malaysia and Nepal?
- 1.1%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Nepal?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Malaysia and Nepal rank globally for share of forest with a long-term management plan?
- Malaysia ranks 56th and Nepal ranks 59th of 131 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of forest with a long-term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%).