Malaysia vs Uruguay: Proportion of forest area with long term management plan
Malaysia
54.56
in 2020
Uruguay
58.62
in 2020
Malaysia rank
53rd
Uruguay rank
50th
Proportion of forest area with long term management plan over time
- Malaysia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 58.62 against 54.56 in Malaysia, a difference of 4.06.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 53rd and Uruguay ranks 50th of 119 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.66 | 34.02 | 11.64 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 52.77 | 54.21 | 1.43 | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 54.56 | 58.62 | 4.06 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with long term management plan, Malaysia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 58.62 against 54.56 in Malaysia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with long term management plan between Malaysia and Uruguay?
- 4.06, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Uruguay?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Malaysia and Uruguay rank globally for proportion of forest area with long term management plan?
- Malaysia ranks 53rd and Uruguay ranks 50th of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area with long term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.