Mexico vs United Republic of Tanzania: Proportion of forest area with long term management plan
Mexico
7.08
in 2017
United Republic of Tanzania
4.43
in 2020
Mexico rank
101st
United Republic of Tanzania rank
103rd
Proportion of forest area with long term management plan over time
- Mexico
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 7.08 against 4.43 in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 2.65.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.6 times United Republic of Tanzania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
Mexico ranks 101st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 103rd of 119 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.65 | 4.43 | 1.78 | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2010s | 7.5 | 4.43 | 3.08 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with long term management plan, Mexico or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Mexico, at 7.08 against 4.43 in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2017.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with long term management plan between Mexico and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 2.65, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Mexico and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for proportion of forest area with long term management plan?
- Mexico ranks 101st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 103rd of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area with long term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.