Mexico vs Zimbabwe: Proportion of forest area with long term management plan
Mexico
7.08
in 2017
Zimbabwe
4.57
in 2020
Mexico rank
101st
Zimbabwe rank
102nd
Proportion of forest area with long term management plan over time
- Mexico
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 7.08 against 4.57 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.51.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.5 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Mexico ranks 101st and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 119 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.65 | 4.64 | 1.99 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 7.5 | 4.57 | 2.93 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with long term management plan, Mexico or Zimbabwe?
- Mexico, at 7.08 against 4.57 in Zimbabwe as of 2017.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with long term management plan between Mexico and Zimbabwe?
- 2.51, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Mexico and Zimbabwe rank globally for proportion of forest area with long term management plan?
- Mexico ranks 101st and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area with long term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.