Moldova vs New Zealand: Share of forest with a long-term management plan
Moldova
82.6%
in 2025
New Zealand
75.3%
in 2025
Moldova rank
32nd
New Zealand rank
39th
Share of forest with a long-term management plan over time
- Moldova
- New Zealand
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 82.6% against 75.3% in New Zealand, a difference of 7.3%.
That makes Moldova's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.
Moldova ranks 32nd and New Zealand ranks 39th of 131 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72.8% | 64.5% | 8.2% | Moldova |
| 2000s | 73.5% | 71.1% | 2.3% | Moldova |
| 2010s | 79.9% | 74.9% | 5.1% | Moldova |
| 2020s | 81.5% | 75.3% | 6.3% | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of forest with a long-term management plan, Moldova or New Zealand?
- Moldova, at 82.6% against 75.3% in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in share of forest with a long-term management plan between Moldova and New Zealand?
- 7.3%, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and New Zealand?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Moldova and New Zealand rank globally for share of forest with a long-term management plan?
- Moldova ranks 32nd and New Zealand ranks 39th of 131 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of forest with a long-term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%).