Nepal vs Romania: Proportion of forest area with long term management plan
Nepal
82.72
in 2020
Romania
80.97
in 2020
Nepal rank
28th
Romania rank
30th
Proportion of forest area with long term management plan over time
- Nepal
- Romania
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 82.72 against 80.97 in Romania, a difference of 1.75.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Romania ahead.
Nepal ranks 28th and Romania ranks 30th of 119 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.87 | 86.71 | 3.84 | Romania |
| 2010s | 82.72 | 81.13 | 1.59 | Nepal |
| 2020s | 82.72 | 80.97 | 1.75 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with long term management plan, Nepal or Romania?
- Nepal, at 82.72 against 80.97 in Romania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with long term management plan between Nepal and Romania?
- 1.75, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Romania?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Nepal and Romania rank globally for proportion of forest area with long term management plan?
- Nepal ranks 28th and Romania ranks 30th of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area with long term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.