Romania vs Sweden: Proportion of forest area with long term management plan
Romania
80.97
in 2020
Sweden
81.06
in 2020
Romania rank
30th
Sweden rank
29th
Proportion of forest area with long term management plan over time
- Romania
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 81.06 against 80.97 in Romania, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sweden ahead.
Romania ranks 30th and Sweden ranks 29th of 119 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.71 | 95.68 | 8.97 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 81.13 | 81.08 | 0.045 | Romania |
| 2020s | 80.97 | 81.06 | 0.09 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with long term management plan, Romania or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 81.06 against 80.97 in Romania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with long term management plan between Romania and Sweden?
- 0.09, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Sweden?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Romania and Sweden rank globally for proportion of forest area with long term management plan?
- Romania ranks 30th and Sweden ranks 29th of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area with long term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.