Tonga vs Zimbabwe: Share of forest with a long-term management plan
Tonga
22.9%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
21.5%
in 2025
Tonga rank
84th
Zimbabwe rank
87th
Share of forest with a long-term management plan over time
- Tonga
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 22.9% against 21.5% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.
Tonga ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 87th of 131 countries.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tonga | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.9% | 21.5% | 1.4% | Tonga |
| 2000s | 22.9% | 21.5% | 1.4% | Tonga |
| 2010s | 22.5% | 10.2% | 12.3% | Tonga |
| 2020s | 22.9% | 21.5% | 1.4% | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of forest with a long-term management plan, Tonga or Zimbabwe?
- Tonga, at 22.9% against 21.5% in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in share of forest with a long-term management plan between Tonga and Zimbabwe?
- 1.4%, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tonga and Zimbabwe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Tonga and Zimbabwe rank globally for share of forest with a long-term management plan?
- Tonga ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 87th of 131 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of forest with a long-term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%).