Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Nepal: Proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
16.75
in 2020
Nepal
17.28
in 2020
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
85th
Nepal rank
84th
Proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas over time
- Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 17.28 against 16.75 in Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, a difference of 0.53.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 85th and Nepal ranks 84th of 156 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.75 | 17.28 | 0.53 | Nepal |
| 2010s | 16.75 | 17.28 | 0.53 | Nepal |
| 2020s | 16.75 | 17.28 | 0.53 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 17.28 against 16.75 in Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Nepal?
- 0.53, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Nepal?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Nepal rank globally for proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas?
- Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 85th and Nepal ranks 84th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.