Chile vs Estonia: Proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas
Chile
21.62
in 2020
Estonia
21.99
in 2020
Chile rank
61st
Estonia rank
60th
Proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas over time
- Chile
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 21.99 against 21.62 in Chile, a difference of 0.37.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 61st and Estonia ranks 60th of 156 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.3 | 5.82 | 14.48 | Chile |
| 2010s | 21.4 | 21.3 | 0.095 | Chile |
| 2020s | 21.62 | 21.99 | 0.37 | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas, Chile or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 21.99 against 21.62 in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas between Chile and Estonia?
- 0.37, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Estonia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Estonia rank globally for proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas?
- Chile ranks 61st and Estonia ranks 60th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.