Guinea-Bissau vs Iceland: Proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas
Guinea-Bissau
1.29
in 2020
Iceland
1.27
in 2017
Guinea-Bissau rank
145th
Iceland rank
146th
Proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Iceland
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 1.29 against 1.27 in Iceland, a difference of 0.02.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 145th and Iceland ranks 146th of 156 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.34 | 1 | 0.34 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 1.33 | 1.27 | 0.0625 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas, Guinea-Bissau or Iceland?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 1.29 against 1.27 in Iceland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas between Guinea-Bissau and Iceland?
- 0.02, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Iceland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Iceland rank globally for proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 145th and Iceland ranks 146th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.