Congo vs Dominican Republic: Share using safely managed drinking water
Congo
45.9%
in 2021
Dominican Republic
45.3%
in 2024
Congo rank
127th
Dominican Republic rank
128th
Share using safely managed drinking water over time
- Congo
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Congo currently reports 45.9% against 45.3% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Congo ranks 127th and Dominican Republic ranks 128th of 163 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Dominican Republic in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.7% | 42.8% | 11.2% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 43.5% | 44.4% | 0.9% | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 45.8% | 45.1% | 0.7% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share using safely managed drinking water, Congo or Dominican Republic?
- Congo, at 45.9% against 45.3% in Dominican Republic as of 2021.
- What is the difference in share using safely managed drinking water between Congo and Dominican Republic?
- 0.6%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Dominican Republic?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Congo and Dominican Republic rank globally for share using safely managed drinking water?
- Congo ranks 127th and Dominican Republic ranks 128th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share using safely managed drinking water. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination.