Georgia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Share using safely managed drinking water
Georgia
70.5%
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
69.4%
in 2024
Georgia rank
98th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
100th
Share using safely managed drinking water over time
- Georgia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 70.5% against 69.4% in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Georgia ranks 98th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 100th of 163 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.6% | 69.3% | 8.8% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 64.5% | 69.3% | 4.8% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 70.0% | 69.3% | 0.7% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share using safely managed drinking water, Georgia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Georgia, at 70.5% against 69.4% in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share using safely managed drinking water between Georgia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 1.1%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for share using safely managed drinking water?
- Georgia ranks 98th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 100th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share using safely managed drinking water. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.