Gibraltar vs Hong Kong: Share using safely managed drinking water

Gibraltar
100.0%
in 2024
Hong Kong
100.0%
in 2024
Gibraltar rank
1st
Hong Kong rank
1st

Share using safely managed drinking water over time

  • Gibraltar
  • Hong Kong
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Gibraltar currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Gibraltar ahead.

Gibraltar ranks 1st and Hong Kong ranks 1st of 163 countries.

Gibraltar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gibraltar Hong Kong Difference Ahead
2000s 100.0% 98.8% 1.2% Gibraltar
2010s 100.0% 99.6% 0.4% Gibraltar
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share using safely managed drinking water, Gibraltar or Hong Kong?
Gibraltar, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Hong Kong as of 2024.
What is the difference in share using safely managed drinking water between Gibraltar and Hong Kong?
0.0%, with Gibraltar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Hong Kong?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Gibraltar and Hong Kong rank globally for share using safely managed drinking water?
Gibraltar ranks 1st and Hong Kong ranks 1st of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share using safely managed drinking water. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Share using safely managed drinking water
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
163 places, 3,991 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.