Angola vs Japan: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas
Angola
65.9%
in 2025
Japan
66.2%
in 2025
Angola rank
59th
Japan rank
57th
Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas over time
- Angola
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 66.2% against 65.9% in Angola, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 59th and Japan ranks 57th of 190 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.9% | 22.4% | 43.5% | Angola |
| 2010s | 65.9% | 47.8% | 18.1% | Angola |
| 2020s | 65.9% | 63.9% | 2.1% | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas, Angola or Japan?
- Japan, at 66.2% against 65.9% in Angola as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas between Angola and Japan?
- 0.3%, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Japan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Japan rank globally for protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas?
- Angola ranks 59th and Japan ranks 57th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC β processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).