Aruba vs Madagascar: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas
Aruba
23.92
in 2024
Madagascar
21.18
in 2024
Aruba rank
130th
Madagascar rank
133rd
Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas over time
- Aruba
- Madagascar
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 23.92 against 21.18 in Madagascar, a difference of 2.74.
That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 130th and Madagascar ranks 133rd of 182 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.92 | 9.59 | 14.33 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 23.92 | 16.96 | 6.96 | Aruba |
| 2020s | 23.92 | 21.18 | 2.74 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas, Aruba or Madagascar?
- Aruba, at 23.92 against 21.18 in Madagascar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas between Aruba and Madagascar?
- 2.74, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Madagascar?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Madagascar rank globally for protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas?
- Aruba ranks 130th and Madagascar ranks 133rd of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.