Aruba vs Mayotte: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas
Aruba
93.8%
in 2025
Mayotte
90.9%
in 2025
Aruba rank
17th
Mayotte rank
19th
Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas over time
- Aruba
- Mayotte
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 93.8% against 90.9% in Mayotte, a difference of 2.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mayotte ahead.
Aruba ranks 17th and Mayotte ranks 19th of 190 countries.
Mayotte has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Mayotte | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 45.7% | 45.7% | Mayotte |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 90.4% | 90.4% | Mayotte |
| 2020s | 46.9% | 90.9% | 44.0% | Mayotte |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas, Aruba or Mayotte?
- Aruba, at 93.8% against 90.9% in Mayotte as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas between Aruba and Mayotte?
- 2.9%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Mayotte?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Mayotte rank globally for protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas?
- Aruba ranks 17th and Mayotte ranks 19th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).