Australia vs South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas

Australia
66.2%
in 2025
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands
66.5%
in 2025
Australia rank
58th
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands rank
56th

Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas over time

  • Australia
  • South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands
0204060200020122025

How they compare

South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands currently reports 66.5% against 66.2% in Australia, a difference of 0.3%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 58th and South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands ranks 56th of 190 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 46.2% 0.0% 46.2% Australia
2010s 60.7% 53.2% 7.5% Australia
2020s 65.8% 66.5% 0.7% South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas, Australia or South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands?
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, at 66.5% against 66.2% in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas between Australia and South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands?
0.3%, with South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Australia and South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands rank globally for protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas?
Australia ranks 58th and South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands ranks 56th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid, drawing on BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protected-area-coverage-of-marine-key-biodiversity-areas/australia/south-georgia-and-the-south-sandwich-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protected-area-coverage-of-marine-key-biodiversity-areas/australia/south-georgia-and-the-south-sandwich-islands/">Australia vs South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas
Unit
%
Source
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
190 places, 4,940 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).