Bahamas vs Greenland: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas
Bahamas
30.2%
in 2025
Greenland
29.6%
in 2025
Bahamas rank
129th
Greenland rank
131st
Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas over time
- Bahamas
- Greenland
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 30.2% against 29.6% in Greenland, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Greenland ahead.
Bahamas ranks 129th and Greenland ranks 131st of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Greenland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.7% | 26.2% | 18.5% | Greenland |
| 2010s | 19.7% | 29.2% | 9.5% | Greenland |
| 2020s | 30.2% | 29.6% | 0.6% | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas, Bahamas or Greenland?
- Bahamas, at 30.2% against 29.6% in Greenland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas between Bahamas and Greenland?
- 0.6%, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Greenland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Bahamas and Greenland rank globally for protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas?
- Bahamas ranks 129th and Greenland ranks 131st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).