Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Seychelles: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
73.5%
in 2025
Seychelles
71.9%
in 2025
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
43rd
Seychelles rank
48th

Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas over time

  • Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
  • Seychelles
203040506070200020122025

How they compare

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba currently reports 73.5% against 71.9% in Seychelles, a difference of 1.6%.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba has been ahead every year.

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 43rd and Seychelles ranks 48th of 190 countries.

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba Seychelles Difference Ahead
2000s 43.7% 24.9% 18.8% Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
2010s 58.6% 24.9% 33.7% Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
2020s 73.5% 71.9% 1.7% Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba or Seychelles?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, at 73.5% against 71.9% in Seychelles as of 2025.
What is the difference in protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Seychelles?
1.6%, with Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Seychelles?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Seychelles rank globally for protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 43rd and Seychelles ranks 48th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Seychelles: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid, drawing on BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protected-area-coverage-of-marine-key-biodiversity-areas/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/seychelles/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protected-area-coverage-of-marine-key-biodiversity-areas/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/seychelles/">Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Seychelles: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas
Unit
%
Source
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
190 places, 4,940 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).