Colombia vs Pitcairn: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas
Colombia
59.32
in 2024
Pitcairn
57.17
in 2024
Colombia rank
63rd
Pitcairn rank
64th
Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas over time
- Colombia
- Pitcairn
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 59.32 against 57.17 in Pitcairn, a difference of 2.15.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 63rd and Pitcairn ranks 64th of 182 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Pitcairn | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.54 | 16.33 | 27.21 | Colombia |
| 2010s | 52.11 | 32.67 | 19.45 | Colombia |
| 2020s | 59.28 | 57.17 | 2.11 | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas, Colombia or Pitcairn?
- Colombia, at 59.32 against 57.17 in Pitcairn as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas between Colombia and Pitcairn?
- 2.15, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Pitcairn?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Colombia and Pitcairn rank globally for protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas?
- Colombia ranks 63rd and Pitcairn ranks 64th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.