Congo vs Pitcairn Islands: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas
Congo
55.63
in 2024
Pitcairn Islands
57.17
in 2024
Congo rank
66th
Pitcairn Islands rank
64th
Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas over time
- Congo
- Pitcairn Islands
How they compare
Pitcairn Islands currently reports 57.17 against 55.63 in Congo, a difference of 1.54.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 66th and Pitcairn Islands ranks 64th of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Pitcairn Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Pitcairn Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.22 | 16.33 | 18.89 | Congo |
| 2010s | 41.34 | 32.67 | 8.68 | Congo |
| 2020s | 55.63 | 57.17 | 1.54 | Pitcairn Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas, Congo or Pitcairn Islands?
- Pitcairn Islands, at 57.17 against 55.63 in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas between Congo and Pitcairn Islands?
- 1.54, with Pitcairn Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Pitcairn Islands?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Pitcairn Islands rank globally for protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas?
- Congo ranks 66th and Pitcairn Islands ranks 64th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.