Curacao vs Grenada: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas
Curacao
30.2%
in 2025
Grenada
30.2%
in 2025
Curacao rank
127th
Grenada rank
128th
Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas over time
- Curacao
- Grenada
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 30.2% against 30.2% in Grenada, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Curacao ahead.
Curacao ranks 127th and Grenada ranks 128th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Curacao averaged higher in 2 and Grenada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.2% | 0.1% | 5.1% | Curacao |
| 2010s | 19.3% | 24.2% | 4.9% | Grenada |
| 2020s | 30.2% | 30.2% | 0.0% | Curacao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas, Curacao or Grenada?
- Curacao, at 30.2% against 30.2% in Grenada as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas between Curacao and Grenada?
- 0.0%, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Grenada?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Curacao and Grenada rank globally for protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas?
- Curacao ranks 127th and Grenada ranks 128th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).