Greenland vs Grenada: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas
Greenland
29.6%
in 2025
Grenada
30.2%
in 2025
Greenland rank
131st
Grenada rank
128th
Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas over time
- Greenland
- Grenada
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 30.2% against 29.6% in Greenland, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Greenland ahead.
Greenland ranks 131st and Grenada ranks 128th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 2 and Grenada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.2% | 0.1% | 26.1% | Greenland |
| 2010s | 29.2% | 24.2% | 5.1% | Greenland |
| 2020s | 29.6% | 30.2% | 0.6% | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas, Greenland or Grenada?
- Grenada, at 30.2% against 29.6% in Greenland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas between Greenland and Grenada?
- 0.6%, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Grenada?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Greenland and Grenada rank globally for protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas?
- Greenland ranks 131st and Grenada ranks 128th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC β processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).