Heard Island and McDonald Islands vs Mayotte: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas

Heard Island and McDonald Islands
100.0%
in 2025
Mayotte
90.9%
in 2025
Heard Island and McDonald Islands rank
1st
Mayotte rank
19th

Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas over time

  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands
  • Mayotte
020406080100200020122025

How they compare

Heard Island and McDonald Islands currently reports 100.0% against 90.9% in Mayotte, a difference of 9.1%.

That makes Heard Island and McDonald Islands's figure about 1.1 times Mayotte's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Heard Island and McDonald Islands has been ahead every year.

Heard Island and McDonald Islands ranks 1st and Mayotte ranks 19th of 190 countries.

Heard Island and McDonald Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heard Island and McDonald Islands Mayotte Difference Ahead
2000s 100.0% 45.7% 54.3% Heard Island and McDonald Islands
2010s 100.0% 90.4% 9.6% Heard Island and McDonald Islands
2020s 100.0% 90.9% 9.1% Heard Island and McDonald Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas, Heard Island and McDonald Islands or Mayotte?
Heard Island and McDonald Islands, at 100.0% against 90.9% in Mayotte as of 2025.
What is the difference in protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas between Heard Island and McDonald Islands and Mayotte?
9.1%, with Heard Island and McDonald Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heard Island and McDonald Islands and Mayotte?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Heard Island and McDonald Islands and Mayotte rank globally for protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas?
Heard Island and McDonald Islands ranks 1st and Mayotte ranks 19th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heard Island and McDonald Islands vs Mayotte: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid, drawing on BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protected-area-coverage-of-marine-key-biodiversity-areas/heard-island-and-mcdonald-islands/mayotte/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protected-area-coverage-of-marine-key-biodiversity-areas/heard-island-and-mcdonald-islands/mayotte/">Heard Island and McDonald Islands vs Mayotte: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas
Unit
%
Source
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
190 places, 4,940 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).