Jersey vs Slovenia: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas
Jersey
64.1%
in 2025
Slovenia
62.2%
in 2025
Jersey rank
61st
Slovenia rank
64th
Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas over time
- Jersey
- Slovenia
How they compare
Jersey currently reports 64.1% against 62.2% in Slovenia, a difference of 1.9%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Jersey has been ahead every year.
Jersey ranks 61st and Slovenia ranks 64th of 190 countries.
Jersey has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jersey | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.6% | 44.8% | 18.8% | Jersey |
| 2010s | 64.0% | 58.0% | 6.0% | Jersey |
| 2020s | 64.1% | 62.2% | 1.8% | Jersey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas, Jersey or Slovenia?
- Jersey, at 64.1% against 62.2% in Slovenia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas between Jersey and Slovenia?
- 1.9%, with Jersey ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jersey and Slovenia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Jersey and Slovenia rank globally for protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas?
- Jersey ranks 61st and Slovenia ranks 64th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC β processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).