Latvia vs Liberia: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas
Latvia
96.1%
in 2025
Liberia
96.7%
in 2025
Latvia rank
15th
Liberia rank
14th
Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas over time
- Latvia
- Liberia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 96.7% against 96.1% in Latvia, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 15th and Liberia ranks 14th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Liberia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.9% | 67.7% | 2.2% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 96.1% | 96.7% | 0.5% | Liberia |
| 2020s | 96.1% | 96.7% | 0.5% | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas, Latvia or Liberia?
- Liberia, at 96.7% against 96.1% in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas between Latvia and Liberia?
- 0.6%, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Liberia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Liberia rank globally for protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas?
- Latvia ranks 15th and Liberia ranks 14th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).