Lithuania vs Namibia: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas
Lithuania
83.4%
in 2025
Namibia
83.0%
in 2025
Lithuania rank
31st
Namibia rank
34th
Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas over time
- Lithuania
- Namibia
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 83.4% against 83.0% in Namibia, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 31st and Namibia ranks 34th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.1% | 28.1% | 39.0% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 78.0% | 83.0% | 4.9% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 83.4% | 83.0% | 0.5% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas, Lithuania or Namibia?
- Lithuania, at 83.4% against 83.0% in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas between Lithuania and Namibia?
- 0.4%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and Namibia rank globally for protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas?
- Lithuania ranks 31st and Namibia ranks 34th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).