Pitcairn vs Qatar: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas
Pitcairn
57.17
in 2024
Qatar
59.99
in 2024
Pitcairn rank
64th
Qatar rank
61st
Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas over time
- Pitcairn
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 59.99 against 57.17 in Pitcairn, a difference of 2.82.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Pitcairn ahead.
Pitcairn ranks 64th and Qatar ranks 61st of 182 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pitcairn | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.33 | 20 | 3.67 | Qatar |
| 2010s | 32.67 | 59.99 | 27.32 | Qatar |
| 2020s | 57.17 | 59.99 | 2.82 | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas, Pitcairn or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 59.99 against 57.17 in Pitcairn as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas between Pitcairn and Qatar?
- 2.82, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pitcairn and Qatar?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Pitcairn and Qatar rank globally for protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas?
- Pitcairn ranks 64th and Qatar ranks 61st of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.