Pitcairn vs Sri Lanka: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas
Pitcairn
57.2%
in 2025
Sri Lanka
58.0%
in 2025
Pitcairn rank
72nd
Sri Lanka rank
71st
Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas over time
- Pitcairn
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 58.0% against 57.2% in Pitcairn, a difference of 0.8%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Pitcairn ranks 72nd and Sri Lanka ranks 71st of 190 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pitcairn | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.3% | 47.5% | 31.2% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 32.7% | 56.5% | 23.8% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 57.2% | 58.0% | 0.9% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas, Pitcairn or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 58.0% against 57.2% in Pitcairn as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas between Pitcairn and Sri Lanka?
- 0.8%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pitcairn and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Pitcairn and Sri Lanka rank globally for protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas?
- Pitcairn ranks 72nd and Sri Lanka ranks 71st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).