Russian Federation vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas

Russian Federation
22.7%
in 2025
Turks and Caicos Islands
22.3%
in 2025
Russian Federation rank
141st
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
142nd

Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0510152025200020122025

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 22.7% against 22.3% in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.4%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 141st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 142nd of 190 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 15.2% 22.3% 7.1% Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 20.5% 22.3% 1.8% Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 22.7% 22.3% 0.4% Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas, Russian Federation or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Russian Federation, at 22.7% against 22.3% in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2025.
What is the difference in protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas between Russian Federation and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.4%, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Turks and Caicos Islands?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Russian Federation and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas?
Russian Federation ranks 141st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 142nd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid, drawing on BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protected-area-coverage-of-marine-key-biodiversity-areas/russian-federation/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protected-area-coverage-of-marine-key-biodiversity-areas/russian-federation/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Russian Federation vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas
Unit
%
Source
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
190 places, 4,940 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).