Statizoid

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas

Saint Kitts and Nevis
51.7%
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
54.0%
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
82nd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
79th

Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0204060200020122025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 54.0% against 51.7% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 2.3%.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 82nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 79th of 190 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0% 50.3% 50.3% Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 20.9% 54.0% 33.2% Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 51.7% 54.0% 2.3% Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 54.0% against 51.7% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
What is the difference in protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tanzania, United Republic of?
2.3%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tanzania, United Republic of?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 82nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 79th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas. Statizoid, drawing on BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protected-area-coverage-of-marine-key-biodiversity-areas/st-kitts-and-nevis/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protected-area-coverage-of-marine-key-biodiversity-areas/st-kitts-and-nevis/tanzania/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protected area coverage of marine key biodiversity areas
Unit
%
Source
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
190 places, 4,940 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).