Aruba vs Bangladesh: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
Aruba
37.15
in 2024
Bangladesh
37.53
in 2024
Aruba rank
147th
Bangladesh rank
146th
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time
- Aruba
- Bangladesh
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 37.53 against 37.15 in Aruba, a difference of 0.38.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 147th and Bangladesh ranks 146th of 238 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Bangladesh in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Bangladesh | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.15 | 27.74 | 9.41 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 37.15 | 36.95 | 0.201 | Aruba |
| 2020s | 37.15 | 37.53 | 0.38 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, Aruba or Bangladesh?
- Bangladesh, at 37.53 against 37.15 in Aruba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between Aruba and Bangladesh?
- 0.38, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Bangladesh?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Bangladesh rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
- Aruba ranks 147th and Bangladesh ranks 146th of 238 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.